Legal Opinion

Burch v. Kenmore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1949No. 16848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The husband did not except to the order of the trial court permitting the wife to take the minor children to her new home in Alabama. Since no exception is taken to this provision of the judgment, it can not be reviewed under the exceptions made. But see Tillinghast v. Clay, 152 Ga. 816, 820 (111 S. E. 384); Jagoe v. Jagoe, 183 Ga. 273 (187 S. E. 874); King v. King, 202 Ga. 838 (44 S. E. 2d, 791); Good v. Good, 205 Ga. 112 (52 S. E. 2d, 610).

Counsel for the plaintiff in error insists that the court erred in overruling certain special demurrers to the husband’s petition, it being…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coffee v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Wilkins v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Good v. GoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Torras v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. King v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ramsay v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Corriher v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Buxton v. HookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Atwell v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API