M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Higdon
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,672 M & I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK, Appellee, v. KEVIN HIGDON and GRETCHEN HIGDON, Appellants, v. EQUITY BANK, Appellee/Garnishee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Resolution of a conflict-of-laws issue involves a question of law over which appellate courts exercise unlimited review. 2. When addressing choice of law issues, Kansas appellate courts traditionally follow the Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws (1934). 3. A choice-of-law analysis under the Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws begins by looking to the law of the forum state to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Brenner v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026
- In re Estate of MuellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- Prairiewood Holdings v. Board of Riley County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- Prairiewood Holdings v. Board of Riley County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
- Ranjita Bheri, et al. v. Barry Bulakites, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026