Legal Opinion

In Re Molinaro/Catanzaro Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided January 10, 1979No. 170PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman, and EDWARD WEINFELD * , EDWIN A. ROBSON *, STANLEY A. WEIGEL, ANDREW A. CAFFREY*, ROY W. HARPER and CHARLES R. WEINER, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

I. BACKGROUND

The matter now before the Panel involves three actions in three districts: one each in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of New York.

A. Prior Panel Rulings

The Panel issued its first opinion in this docket in July, 1974. In re Molinaro/Catanzaro Patent Litigation, 380 F.Supp. 794 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1974). At that time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Multidistrict Civil Antitrust Actions Involving the Distribution of Scotch WhiskeyUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1969
  2. Catanzaro v. Masco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  3. In Re Molinaro/Catanzaro Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
  4. In Re Molinaro/Catanzaro Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  5. In Re Raymond Lee Org'n Inc. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Magic Marker Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API