Legal Opinion
In Re Molinaro/Catanzaro Patent Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided July 26, 1974No. 170PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH * **§, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER*, JOSEPH S. LORD, III*, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
This litigation involves a patent for a device which controls the tuning of radio receivers. Anthony Catanzaro alleges to be the owner of an undivided half-interest in the patent. Acting pro se, Catanzaro filed eleven actions in six districts against manufacturers and retailers of radio equipment alleging that the sale of some of their radio products constituted infringement of his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Molinaro v. Lafayette Radio ElectronicsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- Catanzaro v. Masco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- In Re Molinaro/Catanzaro Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Practice of Naturopathy LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- Western Electric Co. v. Advanced Memory Systems, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.