Legal Opinion
General Mills, Inc. v. The Pillsbury Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1967No. 18405_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by defendant General Mills, Inc., from judgment entered against it in favor of plaintiff The Pillsbury Company determining Patent No. 3,038,808, hereinafter referred to as the patent, owned by The Pillsbury Company, valid and that defendant has infringed claims 1, 2, 13 and 14 of said patent in the manufacture and sale by it of angel food cake mix known in the record as Product A and sold under the commercial name of Speed-O-Angel Food Bakers’ Cake Base. Defendant was enjoined from infringing on plaintiff’s patent and provision was made for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flour City Architectural Metals v. Alpana Aluminum Products, Inc., Alpana Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Flour City Architectural MetalsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- University of Illinois Foundation v. Winegard CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Transitron Electronic Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft Company, Transitron Electronic Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Woodstream Corporation v. Herter's, Inc. And George L. HerterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.