Legal Opinion
Granger v. Louis Trauth Dairy
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2010No. 2010-SC-000253-WCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed the claimant’s application for benefits, having found that he failed to give timely notice as required by KRS 342.185. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the decision, and a divided Court of Appeals affirmed the Board. Appealing, the claimant asserts that the ALJ erred by failing to find under KRS 342.200 that a mistake or reasonable cause excused his delay in giving notice.
We affirm. Evidence that what at first appeared to be an insignificant bruise had failed to heal after two months; developed into an open, draining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Harlan Fuel Company v. BurkhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Blue Diamond Coal Company v. SteppCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Whittle v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Rowe v. Semet-Solvay Division Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Granger v. Louis Trauth DairyKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Irving Materials, Inc. v. Raymond TungettKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Irving Materials, Inc. v. Raymond TungettKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Pepsico Inc. v. Sean StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021