Guinn v. Dotson
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN, J.
I
Procedural Background
Appellants, Judi L. Guinn and Steven L. Guinn (Guinns), filed a complaint for negligence, dangerous condition of public property, trespass, nuisance, inverse condemnation, and negligent infliction of emotional distress against respondent, James L. Dotson (Dotson), the City of Beaumont (City) and certain contractors regarding the construction of a street in the city. Dotson demurred to the complaint on several grounds, one being that he was a registered civil engineer being sued for professional negligence, and Guinns had failed to comply with Code of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Belridge Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Benson v. Kwikset Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jackson v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. YeghiazarianNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- UDC-Universal Development, L.P v. CH2M HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.