Arnold v. Mathews
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Justice.
1. In this action to enjoin criminal prosecution under certain ordinances of the City of Monroe, the case as made by the pleadings falls -within the general rule, that courts exercising equitable jurisdiction will not enjoin prosecutions under municipal ordinances, even where the ordinances are allegedly invalid and there are threats of arrest and multiplicity of prosections, unless it is shown that the threatened prosecutions are for the sole purpose of unlawfully taking or destroying property or the business of the plaintiff, or that they will in fact result in irreparable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Douglas v. South Georgia Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Mayor &C. of Athens v. Co-Op Cab Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Snow's Laundry v. City of DublinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Thomason v. Harper Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- Finch v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Sarrio v. Gwinnett CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Orwick v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Royal Peacock Social Club, Inc. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970