Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1925No. File No. 5279PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted against John Hirning as superintendent of banks; Fred R. Smith being subsequently substituted as party defendant by stipulation.

An alternative writ of mandamus issued out of this court, directing the defendant to determine the amount necessary to pay a certain claim of the plaintiff against the insolvent Stock Growers’ Bank of Plarrold and certify the same to the depositors’ guaranty fund commission, pursuant to section 9020, Rev. Code 1919, as amended by chapter 134, Laws of 1921, or show cause to the contrary.

The defendant has moved to quash the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Spry v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gibbs v. BerghSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mildenstein v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Potts v. EddySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Kriebs v. HalladaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API