Legal Opinion

State v. Delacerda

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2001No. 26162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal challenges the denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a prosecution for possession of a controlled substance. The evidence was gained when police officers forcibly entered a public restroom that was occupied by Ramon Delacerda and a second man, who attempted to hold the door shut against the police. The district court denied Delacerda’s suppression motion, and Delacerda entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Three police officers went to a tavern to do a “bar check.” Their purpose…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DreierIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State of Iowa v. Paul Andrew MonahanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API