Murgia ex rel. Estate of Murgia v. Reed
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Officers Scott Reed and Robert Parsons (“Defendants”) filed this appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because their motion to dismiss was based on tribal sovereign immunity, we permit this interlocutory appeal. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Vaughn, 509 F.3d 1085, 1088 (9th Cir.2007); see also Romero v. Peterson, 930 F.2d 1502, 1505-06 (10th Cir.1991) (holding that the question of whether defendants were federal or tribal actors was within category of cases that warrant immediate interlocutory appeal).
Mar…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc. v. Ernst Enterprises, Inc., Richard H. Ernst and Eunice R. ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.