Legal Opinion

Tham v. J. T. Steeb Shipping Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1905No. 5463PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Snell, J., entered August 29, 1904, granting a new trial, for error of law, upon motion of the plaintiff, after a trial and verdict in favor of the defendant, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Respondent, while working for appellant upon a scow by the side of the ship “Robert Adamson,” was knocked from said scow by a sling-load of lumber, swung from the rail of said ship. In falling, he struck upon the railing of a naphtha launch, lying alongside the scow, and suffered a broken leg. He brought suit for damages. At the trial, a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

A motion for a new trial was duly made, and was granted by the trial court, solely upon the ground that two of its instructions were inconsistent with, and contradictory to, each-other, and that one of them,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. American Foundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Anderson v. Inland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Jennings v. Tacoma Railway & Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Brown v. Tabor Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Miller v. Moran Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hoseth v. Preston Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Grant v. HuschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API