Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Vanhoose

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2006No. 05-3290PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

In February 1994, Defendant-Appellant Paul VanHoose (“VanHoose”), having been convicted of a federal drug offense, was sentenced to a prison term to be followed by a term of supervised release. Van-Hoose subsequently violated several supervised-release conditions. The district court revoked the supervised-release term and sentenced VanHoose to the maximum statutorily-authorized prison term to be followed by a new term of supervised release. In doing so, the district court invoked 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), a provision that was enacted in September 1994.

VanHoose argues…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. KuehneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. DuaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. James King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. James King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Blake SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API