United States v. Paul Vanhoose
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
In February 1994, Defendant-Appellant Paul VanHoose (“VanHoose”), having been convicted of a federal drug offense, was sentenced to a prison term to be followed by a term of supervised release. Van-Hoose subsequently violated several supervised-release conditions. The district court revoked the supervised-release term and sentenced VanHoose to the maximum statutorily-authorized prison term to be followed by a new term of supervised release. In doing so, the district court invoked 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), a provision that was enacted in September 1994.
VanHoose argues…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. KuehneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DuaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- James King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- James King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Blake SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.