Legal Opinion

United States v. Blake Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 15, 2009No. 08-3168UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Blake Sullivan challenges the term of reimprisonment imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. Because the term is not “plainly unreasonable,” we affirm the judgment.

Sullivan pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The drug quantity triggered a statutory minimum of 120 months’ imprisonment, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), but at sentencing in October 2003 the government moved for a lower term because Sullivan had provided substantial assistance, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e); U.S.S.G. 5K1.1. The district court sentenced Sullivan to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Gary R. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. VerkhoglyadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Ronald BungarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holguin-Hernandez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API