Legal Opinion
Kinneary v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 2005No. 04 CIV. 5183VMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph Kinneary (“Kinneary”) brought this action on June 30, 2004 against Tom Ridge (“Ridge”), Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (the “DHS” or “federal defendant”) along with the City of New York, and, individually, city employees Marsha Rothem, Zoe Ann Campbell, and Louis Tazzi (collectively, the “City defendants”). Kinneary claims violations by both the federal and City defendants of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and by the City defendants of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as a result of their alleged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dresser v. MEBA MEDICAL & BENEFITS PLANCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- De Dandrade v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Kinneary v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- National Association of the Deaf v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Sofia v. EspositoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019