Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ferrell v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1984No. 84-44PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals denied the writ, stating, “[a]n adequate remedy at law exists by way of appeal,” without further explanation.

The record before the court of appeals contained no' more than is before this court, namely, a copy of appellee’s entry which contains no findings of fact or conclusions of law.

In State v. Mapson (1982), 1 Ohio St. 3d 217, 218, we held that “* * * R.C. 2953.21 mandates that a judgment denying post-conviction relief include findings of fact and conclusions of law, and that a judgment entry filed without such findings is incomplete and it thus does not commence the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MapsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State, ex rel. Turpin v. Court of Common Pleas of Stark CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Penland v. Dinkelacker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Jennings v. NurreOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API