Legal Opinion

Blood v. Morrin

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided November 17, 1905No. 5,198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law. On motion to show cause why an attachment should not issue against plaintiff, Harry E. Blood, for contempt of court.

1Opinion of the Court

FINKELNBURG, District Judge.

This is an action at law for an alleged libel brought to the September term, 1905, of this court by plaintiff, Harry E. Blood, a resident of the state of New York, against John S. Mbrrin, a resident of the state of Missouri. An answer was filed October 10, 1905, alleging various matters of privilege and justification, and on October 11, 1905, a reply was filed whereby the case was brought to an issue. On the 12th day of October, 1905, defendant’s attorneys caused a notice to be served on plaintiff’s attorney that defendant would take the testimony of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Railroad Company v. PollardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Hanks Dental Assn. v. International Tooth Crown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Texas v. ChilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Bagdan Milk Co. v. Dairymen's League Co-op. Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  3. Hawks v. YanceyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API