Legal Opinion

Camden Forge Co. v. County Park Commission

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The writ of certiorari in this cause brings up for review the condemnation proceedings instituted by respondent county park commission of Camden county against prosecutor. The facts are not controverted. Respondent is the creature of statute which was adopted by a popular vote. Pamph. L. 1926, ch. 331; Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. 1925-1930, pp. 1468, 1481, §§ 165-212 et, seq. (An act to establish public parks in certain counties in this state and to regulate same), and the several amendments thereto and supplements thereof. Pursuant to authority…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frelinghuysen v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. State v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  3. Heslin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. Taylor-White Extracting Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Summerill v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  3. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API