Legal Opinion

Summerill v. Hunt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 25, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pboctok, C. C. J.

This action of ejectment was tried before a jury at the Salem Circuit and at the conclusion of the testimony there were cross motions for directed verdicts. At the court’s suggestion, both parties consented that the case be withdrawn from consideration of the jury and the case was submitted to the court on both the facts and the law. Hayes v. Kluge, 86 N. J. L. 657; 92 Atl. Rep. 358.

The evidence seems to be without dispute and the court finds the following to be the facts:

Garnett Summerill owned and was in possession of the premises in question, together with surrounding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McConihay v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. Carroll v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Frelinghuysen v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  5. Currie v. New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hennick v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Hazek v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Valentine v. LamontNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Valentine v. LamontNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API