Summerill v. Hunt
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pboctok, C. C. J.
This action of ejectment was tried before a jury at the Salem Circuit and at the conclusion of the testimony there were cross motions for directed verdicts. At the court’s suggestion, both parties consented that the case be withdrawn from consideration of the jury and the case was submitted to the court on both the facts and the law. Hayes v. Kluge, 86 N. J. L. 657; 92 Atl. Rep. 358.
The evidence seems to be without dispute and the court finds the following to be the facts:
Garnett Summerill owned and was in possession of the premises in question, together with surrounding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McConihay v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Carroll v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Frelinghuysen v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Currie v. New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hennick v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Hazek v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Valentine v. LamontNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Valentine v. LamontNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952