Legal Opinion

Hubsch v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1950No. 2PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted writs of certiorari in these cases, 338 U. S. 814, to review a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 174 F. 2d 7, affirming judgments of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida in favor of the United States on claims arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Before argument, petitioners and the Solicitor General submitted a joint application for approval of proposed settlements of the claims, citing 28 U. S. C. § 2677, which reads as follows:

“The Attorney General, with the approval of the court, may arbitrate, compromise, or settle any claim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hubsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. John M. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Grover AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Rowley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
  5. Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API