Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfredo Jiminez Flores

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1982No. 80-1705PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Alfredo Flores appeals his conviction for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, a violation of 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a)(1) (1976).

The firearm was discovered during a search of Flores’ apartment for evidence that another convicted felon, Douglas Bontempi, was committing the same crime. Flores’ primary contention is that there was insufficient evidence to support the search warrant which sought evidence that Bontempi illegally possessed firearms. Flores also contests the admissibility of a letter in which his attorney admitted Flores’ ownership of the gun. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Thomas James SavocaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API