Legal Opinion

Small v. Britt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1983No. 8216SC1113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

We find no error in the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion to dismiss. A Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is the proper method to test whether a pleading is legally sufficient. In determining as a matter of law whether the allegations state a claim for which relief may be granted, the allegations of a complaint are viewed as admitted. Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 185, 254 S.E. 2d 611, 615 (1979). A complaint may be dismissed only if it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Forbis v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Evans v. ChippsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Walker v. SantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Walker v. SantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API