Legal Opinion

Evans v. Chipps

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1982No. 815SC605PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

“[I]n determining the applicable statute of limitations, the focus should be upon the nature of the right which has been injured. . . .” Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc., 43 N.C. App. 229, 241, 259 S.E. 2d 1, 9, disc. rev. denied, 298 N.C. 806, 261 S.E. 2d 919 (1979). In the present case, plaintiff’s complaint, when considered in a light most favorable to him, alleges injuries to rights which arguably would produce the following causes of action: an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of civil rights under color of state law; an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Bireline v. SeagondollarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Jarrell v. Samsonite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fowler v. ValencourtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Staley v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Clark v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Porter v. GroatDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
  5. Reagan v. HamptonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API