Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Estate of Huston

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 18, 2003No. 89,177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

In this personal injury action, the defendant, the estate of Geneva Huston (estate), maintained that the action was barred by the applicable 2-year statute of limitations. The trial court agreed and granted the estate’s motion to dismiss. On appeal, the plaintiff, Stacy E. Hinds, contends that his amended petition to correctly name the defendant was “within the period provided by law for commencing tire action against” the defendant, so that his amended petition did relate back and therefore the statute of limitations did not bar the action. We agree and reverse.

On May 19,2000,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vorhees v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Muhammed v. WelchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Back-Wenzel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Moore v. Luther Ex Rel. LutherDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Back-Wenzel v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API