Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Painter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1958No. 40,860PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was an action for ejectment, quiet title, accounting and partition. Judgment was for the defendant Emmett Farrell; and plaintiffs, Joseph Hurley and Henry J. Ziemba, appeal. The case is here a second time. In the first appeal, the order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to defendant Farrells evidence was reversed and the case was returned for a new trial. (Hurley v. Painter, 180 Kan. 552, 306 P. 2d 184.) In order to avoid duplication, that opinion is made a part hereof.

Rriefiy stated, the facts are as follows: At the time of Ellen…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Brent v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Long Ex Rel. Long v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Anderson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Kitchen v. Lasley Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Chute v. Old American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Ater v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API