Legal Opinion

Rodrick Smith v. Kikimoon Fredrick, et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 6, 2026No. 2:25-cv-10038Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RODRICK SMITH, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-10038 District Judge Linda V. Parker v. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti KIKIMOON FREDRICK, et al., Defendants. / MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE BASIS OF EXHAUSTION (ECF NO. 22) I. RECOMMENDATION: The Could should GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 22). In particular, the Court should GRANT summary judgment for Defendants Belinda…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API