Legal Opinion
Friedmann v. Internal Revenue Service
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 31, 2024No. 3:23-cv-05075Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 MICHAEL FRIEDMANN, CASE NO. 3:23-cv-05075-TL 12 Plaintiff, OMNIBUS ORDER ON v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al., DISMISS, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 14 FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 15 SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION UNDER 16 RULE 56(D) 17 18 Plaintiff brings various claims relating to a 2018 tax refund he alleges he did not receive. 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. No. 25. Having 20 considered the relevant…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.