Legal Opinion
Yan Liu v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2011No. 08-72849PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The motion to amend the opinion, filed March 25, 2011, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
The opinion filed on February 23, 2011, slip op. 2789, and appearing at 632 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir.2011), is AMENDED as follows:
In Section II.B of the opinion, at slip op. 2806 through 2807, 632 F.3d at 1160, the sixth paragraph, which states:
In support of its ruling, the BIA also cited the IJ’s fourth ground for the frivolousness finding — the discrepancy between the dates of Liu’s uncle’s arrest. As discussed previously, Liu did have some opportunity to explain this discrepancy, and we have agreed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Noemi GARROVILLAS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Ana Maria Lanza v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Singh v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Jie Cui v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Rogelio Vazquez Romero v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Singh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Jeidy Esquivel-Rubinos v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.