Legal Opinion

Middendorf v. Goodale

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 13, 1923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Reversing.

The sole question presented for decision on this appeal is, whether a certain typewritten instrument marked “exhibit A,” appearing in the record, is subject to the recording tax of 20 cents upon each $100.00 or fraction thereof of indebtedness, secured thereby, imposed by Kentucky Statutes, section 4019a-9 (Carroll’s edition 1922) and, by its provisions, required to be paid the county clerk in whose office the instrument is first recorded, when it is lodged for record.

The parties to the writing in question are the appellees, Levi C. Goodale and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Minot v. WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Pittman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Franklin Society for Home Building & Savings v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Coleman, State Aud. v. Consolidated Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API