Osby v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Appellant Daimion Demon Osby was convicted of capital murder for killing two unarmed men who were — at the time of the shooting — being held back by his friends. Osby confessed to shooting both victims and does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Rather, his appeal centers around his claim of self-de fense. In two points of error, Osby complains that the trial court improperly excluded his psychologist’s expert testimony concerning his state of mind at the time he committed the offense. Because we hold the trial court properly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Cohn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Russell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Duren v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Karnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Greenwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.