Legal Opinion

United States v. Branden Pete

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2016No. 14-10370PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Branden Pete was 16 years old when he committed a crime that resulted in a mandatory sentence of life without the possibility of parole. Later, Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), held unconstitutional for juvenile offenders mandatory terms of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. On resentencing, the district court refused to appoint a neuropsychological expert pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e) to help Pete develop mitigating evidence.

Our principal question on appeal is whether the district court abused its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Edward McCainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. People v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. Williams-BeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Ross v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API