United States v. Branden Pete
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Branden Pete was 16 years old when he committed a crime that resulted in a mandatory sentence of life without the possibility of parole. Later, Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), held unconstitutional for juvenile offenders mandatory terms of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. On resentencing, the district court refused to appoint a neuropsychological expert pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e) to help Pete develop mitigating evidence.
Our principal question on appeal is whether the district court abused its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Edward McCainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- People v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. Williams-BeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Ross v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.