Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Morris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1929No. 8 Div. 82PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Appeal from decree dissolving a temporary injunction for want of equity in the bill.

The bill of complaint, to state its essence, makes the following case:

Complainant is now, and hds for 16 years been, employed as a trainman of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company-; for the past 11 years has been a locomotive fireman, earning fairly lucrative wages. Complainant and family are dependent on such wages for a livelihood.

A rigid custom of the employer is to discharge an employg whose wages are garnished for the third time. Two garnishments have been run, and a third would result in his discharge.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Watson v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Sparks v. McCrearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Hardie-Tynes Mfg. Co. v. CruiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Lopes v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carter v. Knapp Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Hall v. Integon Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Dale v. City Plumbing & Heating Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Lash v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API