Legal Opinion
Hall v. Integon Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 13, 1984No. 82-1197PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU
This action arose out of the plaintiff's discharge from his position as Integon Life Insurance Company's regional general agent in Florence, Alabama. The complaint alleged fraud, breach of contract, and wrongful discharge against Integon and tortious interference with Hall's contract with Integon against Donald Brackin and Harold Barber. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants. The plaintiff, Lilbourne Hall, appeals as to Integon Life Insurance Company and Donald Brackin. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The following counts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Bates v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Alabama Power Co. v. PierreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Polytec, Inc. v. Utah Foam Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lassiter v. Alabama A & M UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Lassiter v. AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Drummond Co. v. Walter Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ramsay Health Care, Inc. v. FollmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.