Legal Opinion

Rich v. Sills

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1957No. 1917PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellees built and offered for sale a group of twenty-two homes. Appellant was the first to purchase one of these homes and his sales contract contained the following provision:

“In the event present sale prices of the other homes are lowered by the present owners then in that event an adjustment on a pro-rata basis shall be made with the purchasers * *

In this action appellant alleged that after the sale to him appellees sold the remaining houses at reduced prices and that by reason of the above-quoted provision he was entitled to a refund. At the conclusion of all the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Soldano v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. United Services Life Ins. Co. v. RingsdorfDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Chase v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API