Rich v. Sills
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellees built and offered for sale a group of twenty-two homes. Appellant was the first to purchase one of these homes and his sales contract contained the following provision:
“In the event present sale prices of the other homes are lowered by the present owners then in that event an adjustment on a pro-rata basis shall be made with the purchasers * *
In this action appellant alleged that after the sale to him appellees sold the remaining houses at reduced prices and that by reason of the above-quoted provision he was entitled to a refund. At the conclusion of all the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Soldano v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- United Services Life Ins. Co. v. RingsdorfDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by15 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chase v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.