Legal Opinion · Dissent

Griffin v. Lindsey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 4, 2015No. 88/14Published

1Dissent

GREENE, J.,

which McDONALD, J., joins.

I respectfully dissent.

Against the General Assembly’s goal in enacting § 11-103 of the Criminal Procedure Article (“CP”) — which serves to protect the rights victims of crimes are afforded by law — the majority in essence holds that a victim1 may not seek appellate review of a trial court’s final order denying the victim’s right to restitution where that final order is the court’s *293response to a timely filed motion to reconsider its previous denial of a request for restitution. Here the timing of the motion for reconsideration afforded the trial judge the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Wilson-X v. Department of Human Resources Ex Rel. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Lopez-Sanchez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API