Legal Opinion
Harold Hodge v. Pamela Talkin
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 28, 2015No. 13-5250PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SRINIVASAN.
SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge:
For more than sixty-five years, a federal statute has restricted the public’s conduct of expressive activity within the building and grounds of the Supreme Court. The law contains two prohibitions within the same sentence. The first makes it unlawful “to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds” (the Assemblages Clause). The second makes it unlawful “to display in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- James P. Crocker v. Deputy Sheriff Steven Eric BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. David BronsteinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Verlo v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Larry Ball v. City of LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.