Legal Opinion

Citizens' Bank v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 22, 1898No. 297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Linn district court; J. S. West, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J.:

The proceedings of the trial court were upon an agreed statement of facts, in substance as follows : On July 19, 1893, in a suit brought by the attorney-general, a receiver was appointed by the district court of Linn county to wind up the affairs of the Citizens’ Bank of Mound City, Kansas, the bank being insolvent. A. G. Seaman was appointed receiver, and immediately took charge of the affairs and assets of the bank. While the bank was a going •concern, Milton F. Mitchell had received from it collateral notes amounting to $1044.16 to secure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. Wurtz, Austin & McVeigh v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  3. Besley v. LawrenceNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. v. Citizens Bank of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. American National Bank v. BranchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Seattle v. Mansfield State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. Rankin v. Yellowstone Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Rundquist v. O'LEARYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API