Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Seattle v. Mansfield State Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1923No. 18212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

When the insolvent state hank involved herein suspended payment, it was indebted to appellant upon a net indebtedness of $126,631.61, for a part of which, $30,000, it had collateral security aggregating $39,647.27, and at the time of suspension had on deposit with appellant the sum of $2,559.23. Appellant filed a claim with the banking department, liquidating the insolvent’s estate, for the net sum of $126,631.61, not deducting any of the collateral or the proceeds thereof. The claim was rejected and appellant brought this suit.

The sole question involved is the right of appellant to have its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Wurtz, Austin & McVeigh v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  3. Hanson v. SoderbergWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Creecy v. . Pearce, Adm'r .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Third National Bank v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Security Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Town of Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Estate of Prescott State BankArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. First Nat. Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Rankin v. Yellowstone Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API