Legal Opinion

State v. Espinoza

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 24, 2020No. 118737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,737 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. FILIBERTO B. ESPINOZA JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A defendant making an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of a sentence under § 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights has an obligation to ensure an adequate factual record is developed in district court. If necessary, this requires the defendant to file a motion invoking the judge's duty to make findings of fact and conclusions of law under Supreme Court Rule 165 (2020 Kan. S. Ct. R. 215). Appeal from Wyandotte District Court;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. State v. SewardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. – State v. Patterson –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. Cervantes-PuentesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  3. In re J.S.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API