State v. Espinoza
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,737 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. FILIBERTO B. ESPINOZA JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A defendant making an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of a sentence under § 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights has an obligation to ensure an adequate factual record is developed in district court. If necessary, this requires the defendant to file a motion invoking the judge's duty to make findings of fact and conclusions of law under Supreme Court Rule 165 (2020 Kan. S. Ct. R. 215). Appeal from Wyandotte District Court;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State v. SewardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- – State v. Patterson –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. Cervantes-PuentesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- In re J.S.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024