Legal Opinion

State v. Shockley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 10, 2021No. 117216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,216 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRUCE T. SHOCKLEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Though a defendant need do nothing to preserve his statutory right to a speedy trial, a defendant's action and participation is required to waive that right. 2. The law presumes that a defendant's waiver of his statutory right to a speedy trial is unconditional. 3. A defendant may place conditions on his waiver of a statutory right to a speedy trial, but the defendant has the responsibility to clarify those conditions. Defendant also has the burden to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. HerbelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. TrautloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SinnardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. GallowaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API