Legal Opinion

Guardian Depositors Corp. v. David Stott Flour Mills, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1939No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 40,450PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I cannot agree that the reference to the clause referring the bondholder to the trust mortgage in order to ascertain the terms and conditions upon which the bonds were issued and secured is obscure or indefinite. It is inconspicuous because grouped with matters not controlling the right to sue on the bond, but it distinctly refers to the trust mortgage and the "terms and conditions on which said bonds are issued and secured." We have consistently held that reference in the bond to the mortgage for other conditions was sufficient. Morley v. University of Detroit,263 Mich. 126; Michigan Trust…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Thatcher v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Morley v. University of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Michigan Trust Co. v. Grand Rapids Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Grand Rapids Independent Publishing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Scott v. PlattOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Edward S. Watts v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Aiton v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API