Legal Opinion

Patino v. Complete Tire, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 10, 2005No. 05-04-00561-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG.

In two issues, Reynaldo C. Patino challenges the summary judgment and discovery sanctions granted in favor of Complete Tire, Inc. For the reasons below, we resolve Patino’s two issues against him and affirm the trial court’s summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Complete Tire, Inc. hired Patino in May 2002 to remove and repair flat truck tires. According to the allegations in Patino’s original petition, on June 10, 2002, while removing a large flat tire from the rim, he was struck in the head by a piece of pipe and was injured. He received medical attention. Complete…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. LMC Complete Automotive, Inc. v. Burke, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Chrismon v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. Jack in the Box, Inc. v. SkilesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bradford Partners II, L.P. v. Fahning, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API