Legal Opinion

State v. Burford

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 14, 2000PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The central question in this appeal is whether defendant’s second-degree eluding conviction qualifies as a “violent crime” subjecting defendant’s sentence to the eighty-five percent minimum term of the “No Early Release Act” (NERA or the Act), N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2. Not before us are any constitutional challenges to the Act. The specific question is whether defendant’s use of a stolen automobile to elude police and his reckless striking of another vehicle during the chase made the stolen automobile a “deadly weapon” under NERA.

N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2 provides:

*18a. A court imposing a sentence of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. KovackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. State v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ManzieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. State v. JamgochianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. State v. DixonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Coyle v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. State of New Jersey v. Hugo FierroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API