Legal Opinion
State v. Manzie
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 13, 2001PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
The members of the Court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division, reported at 335 N.J. Super. 267, 762 A.2d 276 (2000), is affirmed.
STEIN, COLEMAN, and ZAZZALI, JJ., concurring
We would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division based on our concurrence with that court’s conclusion that the No Early Release Act (ÑERA), N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2, does not apply to murder. State v. Manzie, 335 N.J.Super. 267, 278, 762 A.2d 276 (2000). We add these additional observations to amplify our agreement with the Appellate Division’s determination that “if the Legislature had intended…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. NailSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. VandeweagheNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- State v. ParolinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. NegronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.