Legal Opinion

Karla Villa v. Applied Medico-Legal Solutions Risk Retention Group Inc

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 28, 2023No. 2:22-cv-06913Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 JS-6, O 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KARLA VILLA, Case No.: 2:22-cv-06913-MEMF (AFMx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT APPLIED MEDICO-LEGAL SOLUTIONS 13 RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 APPLIED MEDICO-LEGAL SOLUTIONS [ECF NO. 10] RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., AND 15 DOES 1 THROUGH 50, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Applied Medico- 20 Legal Solutions Risk Retention Group, Inc.1 ECF No. 10. For the reasons stated herein, the Court 21 hereby…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API