Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 24, 1990, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Any preference for particular hours, in the absence of compelling circumstances, does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (Matter of Imre [Catherwood] 27 AD2d 970). Here, the record supports the conclusion that claimant’s refusal to change his hours because he desired to do volunteer work was not a sufficiently valid reason…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Claim of SteedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In re the Claim of O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. In re the Claim of ImreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of BiotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API