Legal Opinion

Gurtz v. City of San Bruno

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1935No. Civ. 9818PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs, as residents and taxpayers of the City of San Bruno, brought this action seeking to have declared null and void a certain contract granting to defendant Louis Tournahu an exclusive franchise for the removal of garbage in said City of San Bruno. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

The City Council of the City of San Bruno adopted “An ordinance defining garbage and rubbish and providing for the keeping, collection, removal and disposal thereof and for making contract granting exclusive franchise with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Dean v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Truckee & Tahoe Turnpike Road Co. v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stockton v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Monarch Cablevision, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. East Bay Garbage Co. v. Washington Township Sanitation Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API