United States v. Bryan Puckett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.
*551In this case the government charged the defendants with the wrong crimes. Amir Banyan and Bryan Puckett engaged in a scheme in which they eventually obtained more than $5 million from a pair of mortgage companies by means of fraudulent mortgage applications. The scheme was revealed about two years after it began. Had the government charged Banyan and Puckett with mail or wire fraud within the five-year limitations periods for those offenses, the two likely would have lacked any plausible defense. But for whatever reason the government blew that deadline and instead…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Jessica Arong O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Kenneth Chapman v. Tristar Prods., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Alter Domus (US) LLC v. WingetDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Camp (Sumter)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- United States v. Jessica Arong O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.