Deere & Co. v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Page Circuit Court. Action at law, wlierein certain personal property was seized upon an attachment issued against defendant, Wolff. The Shenandoah National Bank intervenes in the action, claiming ownership of the property. A trial of the issues between plaintiffs and the intervenor resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. The intervenor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
x. contract of sale: illegal consideration: comony:Kwhitfis" fug’forge™" payment?11 I. The personalty in question was seized upon a writ of attachment issued against Wolff. The intervenor claims it under purchase from Wolff, made before the commencement of the suit and issuing of o ^he attachment. In answer to the intervenor’s petition, plaintiffs allege that “all claim or title of intervenor on said proportv is derived from defendant, II. S. Wolff,,but that Wolff never assented to part with any title or intei-est in said property to intervenor, and that all power of assent by said Wolff…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Union Exchange National Bank v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Grand Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Rosenbaum Bros. v. LevittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- E. P. Wilbur Trust Co. v. FahrendorfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Schirm v. WiemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.