Schirm v. Wieman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Sharp,'J.)
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
This suit was instituted to recover upon a check given to the appellant by the appellee, under the circumstances which will afterwards be stated. The case was tried without the intervention of a jury, and but one exception was taken, and. that was to the action of the Court upon the prayers asked for by the respective parties. The Court by its granted instruction, decided there was no sufficient evidence to entitle the appellant to recover. The judgment being against him, the appellant has ^appealed.
The following facts appear from the record: In July, 1904, the appellant and the appellee,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hanauer v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Cass County Bank v. BrickerNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Deere & Co. v. WolfeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
3Cited by8 opinions
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Grand Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Pope v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Davis v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.